Advocates of Meek and Feeble India

Prime Minister of India Mr. Narendra Modi on 11th of July 2022 unveiled the national emblem that has been placed atop the new Parliament building in a special ceremony also attended by Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla and Union Housing Minister Hardeep Puri.

The intial reactions of the opposition were about lack of invitations to the opposition. Opposition also questioned authority of PM to unveil the emblem. AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi said, “As head of the government, the Prime Minister shouldn’t have unveiled the national emblem atop the new Parliament building. The Speaker represents LS, which isn’t subordinate to the government“.

Quickly countering the opposition attack, BJP’s chief spokesperson and Rajya Sabha MP Anil Baluni said the allegations of the opposition parties are politically motivated. “Opposition parties questioning the unveiling ceremony should understand the administrative process. Right from its design to funds and constructions supervision, entire work is being done by the urban development department. Even the foundation laying was done by the prime minister,” Baluni said. He said once the construction work is completed, the building will be handed over to the parliament administration.

Once the initial uproar was about to settle a fresh controversy was fabricated by usual and ever desperate PM critics. The criticism revolved around the so called aggressive look at he lions. Lets first have a look at who said what.

A fierce controversy has broken out over depiction of nation symbol. There is more aggressive depiction of the lions. Is this an insult to national symbol?  – Thundered Rajdeep Sardesai on India Today.

From Gandhi to Godse; From our national emblem with lions sitting majestically & peacefully; to the new national emblem unveiled for the top of the new Parliament building under construction at Central Vista; Angry lions with bared fangs. This is Modi’s new India! – Prashant Bhushan tweets on 12 July 2022.

To completely change the character and nature of the lions on Ashoka’s pillar at Sarnath is nothing but a brazen insult to India’s National Symbol!  – Jairam Ramesh of the Congress tweets on 12 July 2022.

Lions should represent peace and not aggression. – Jawhar Sircar, TMC MP speaking on India Today.

Insult to our national symbol, the majestic Ashokan Lions. Original is on the left, graceful, regally confident. The one on the right is Modi’s version, put above new Parliament building — snarling, unnecessarily aggressive and disproportionate. Shame. Change it immediately. —  Jawhar Sircar , TMC MP tweets.

“The original work has dignity and confidence. The lions there are protective lions. The current sculpture shows anger and discomfort. Here the lions are aggressive,” said Rajmohan Gandhi.

On the face of criticism looks trivial, mediocre – a non-issue. A typical opposition rant – oppose in media whatever PM Modi says and oppose on roads whatever PM Modi implements. Initially many from non-left side could not see anything beyond an ordinary issue, not deserving any special or distinctive attention or discussion. This made them ending up with a technical defense of the emblems.

“People who disrespected constitution, today they are scared of emblem which is sign of India’s pride” – Said Ms. Smriti Irani of the BJP.

“There was no pressure on me to give a certain expression” – Said Artist/Designer of Emblem, Sunil Deore.

Deeper than mere Emblem

However if one takes a pause and makes an attempt to go deeper into core thinking of leftist gang (I refrain myself from calling them party or ideological block), he would realize that opposition to roaring lion is actually opposition to idea of a stronger, Independent India which cannot be enslaved again.

For leftists the idea of India is a meek & feeble state saturated with subjugated Hindu population of apologists and pseudo seculars who have no pride in their history, ancestors and ethos and even their identity and existence. The idea of India is a meek India surrendering to Kashmiri Separatists, Kashmiri Militants, Maoist, ISI, Pakistan’s aggression, Indian Mujahedeen, PFI and most importantly to Friday rioters.

How can India stand tall and strong? How can India buy oil from Russia when USA raises an eyebrow? How can India conduct surgical strike when Pakistan displays military aggression? How can India hang Afzal Guru? How can India care about persecuted non-Muslim minorities in neighboring Islamic countries? How can Indian economy not succumb like Sri Lanka and Pakistan? How can a Hindu monk lead India’s most populous state? How can India dare crush article 370 from a state dominated by Muslims? How can India which took 25 years to launch Polio vaccine, now can vaccinate almost entire adult population in less than 3 years of pandemic burst? How can India not suffer? Finally and most definitely how can India not break again?

The problem is not with statue of a roaring lion. The problem is that it stands for India which wants to roar and stamp its existence in the Kingdom. A direct threat to enemies of India within and outside the kingdom.

The roaring lions also represent a paradigm shift in its national belief – second cheek is not available. If enemies slap us on one cheek, we slap back very hard and make enemy realize the cost of initial slap. And this is the very problem of the leftists cabal.

During 1965 war Ayyub Khan, former President of Pakistan famously said – A Hindu morale would not stand more than a couple of hard blows. Operation Gibraltar was oversold to CIA with a repeated theory of 1:10 Muslim-Hindu ratio suggesting one Muslim soldier was worth 10 Hindu soldiers. This perception is now getting challenged. The aggression and confidence of the enemy is turning into fear and self-doubt after surgical strike. A roaring lion says it loud and clear.

An irrationally pacifist cannot comprehend the connection between aggression, power and peace. A pseudo secularists cannot comprehend distinction between self-respect and surrender. But worse is forces working relentlessly towards breaking India totally comprehend that a collection of unduly pacifists, pseudo seculars and seasonally liberals, is their best tool to disintegrate India. Needless to say the tool as well as the breaking India forces using the tool, both have serious objection to the roaring lion that new India is.

Jai Hind

Kapil Naik

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Few fundamentals to avoid Anxiety & Depression

1) Do your best. Doing best is about staying focused only on what you can control.
2) Stop thinking what does world think of you.
3) Deep breathing for 15 mins X 3 times a day
4) Learn to accept negative outcomes/failures/difficulties as part of life
5) Stay in the moment. Not in tomorrow or future.
6) Stop fearing old age and death. It will come when it has to come. Face it when it comes it.
7) Many times problems are not as serious as we imagine them to be.
8) It is okay to be ordinary and unimpressive. We don’t live to impress every second.
9) Take mini vacations. Cut off yourself from the work. Take multiple 3 day holidays instead of one long 2 weeks holiday.
10) Don’t expect perfection in each and every aspect of life. Choose areas of perfection.
11) Learn to say No
12) Tell the world, when things are not going to happen from your end. World will work out solutions without you also.
13) Stop speculation, anticipation. Sometimes leave things to a surprise. Don’t be desperate to know future before it actually arrives.

Kapil Naik

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Collection of Thoughts – Shri Arun Jaitley

Public Discourse

Word Sanskar today is a ridiculed word.
Today alternative public discourse is nationalism is right wing and insurgency using violence as instrument of overthrowing parliamentary democracy is activism.
— Shri Arun Jaitley, 2018

Threat of Fake Bogey

Today threat to democracy is threat of fake bogey.
Those who criticize the maximum,at times even to extent of bordering on responsibility, then turn around & say free speech is in danger. So threat to free speech is referred by those who use it maximum.

  • Shri Arun Jaitley, 2018

Confederation of States vs Union of States”

Federalism is of course is a challenge. Initially Centre and state relationship was more unitary. When threat to national security was over, after first 30 years, we evolved into more federal system. Today we have federalism in action. We have regional groups and central parties. And having sat through some dozens of meetings of GST council which is India’s first federal institution, I just want to put a word of caution. Federalism in India is essential. India is and should always be union of states (which means) strong state and strong centre. The moment India becomes confederation of states, greater challenges will emerge.

Balance of Indian federalism lies in making India a union of states and no step which goes in direction of making it a confederation of states must be taken.

Governance needs a strong central pole and you can have regional players around but you can not have confederation of regional players because there are issues for which you require India to remain union of states.

Shri Arun Jaitley, 2018

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Betrayal – The name is Jinnah

Betrayal of Jinnah – Balochistan

Few Facts about Balochistan

  1. Balochistan is located on south-eastern Iranian plateau, extending upto western borders of Sindh and Punjab, with area bigger than France.
  2. Before British Raj, Balochistan was divided into 4 princely states, amongst which princely state of Kalat was the most dominating state. Khan of Kalat had total of 75 % of area under Princely state.
  3. Present day province of Balochistan came into effect in 1970
  4. Balochistan, today makes 44 % land area of Pakistan today. Two third of Pakistan’s coastal line lies in Balochistan.
  5. Balochistan is closer to strait of Hormuz from where complete oil supply to India takes place.
  6. Balochistan is home to port Gwadar. Gwadar port remained with Oman till 1958. In 1958 Pakistan purchased Gwadar port from Oman. Gwadar is the outlet for China-Pakistan Corridor (CPEC)

The Government of India Act 1935 included Kalat among princely states of India. However In 1946, Mr. Jinnah acting as legal advisor to Khan of Kalat submitted Memorandum to the cabinet commission, demanding separation of Balochistan from British India. As late as June 1947, Jinnah assured Kalat princely state of the continuance of the independent position of Kalat.
A round table conference was held in Delhi on 4th of Aug 1947. It was attended by Mountbatten, Khan of Kalat and Jinnah. It was decided unanimously that “Kalat State” would remain Independent. And hence eventually a standstill agreement was signed between Kalat and Pakistan (future state). Standstill agreement read – The Government of Pakistan, recognizes Kalat as Independent sovereign state.

In December of 1947, Dar-ul-Awam of Kalat state (Lower House) held a session and passed resolution that relations with Pakistan should be as between two sovereign states. Further in first week of Jan 1948, even the Dar-ul-Umra (Upper House) confirmed independence of Kalat. Thus, both houses of Kalat clearly rejected accession to Pakistan. And it can be safely be said that Jinnah was party to this proclamation in 1946 and in 1947 as well.

Then came the betrayal – hallmark of Jinnah. On 27 Mar 1948, Pakistan army invaded Kalat. Khan of Kalat surrendered and signed Instrument of Accession. Pakistan acknowledged the accession on 30 Mar 1948. During its short Independence from Aug 1947 till Mar 1948, Kalat even had embassy in Pakistan.

Despite heavy funding by Khan of Kalat to Muslim League, Pakistan invaded Kalat. A very important inference that can be drawn here that “Money, development and economic progress cannot always persuade a treacherous person to abdicate treachery”.

Betrayal of Jinnah – Kashmir

Owing to the prevailing circumstances around August of 1946 Maharaja Hari Singh had still not taken decision officially on accession to India. Meanwhile as Khan of Kalat did, Maharaja too signed standstill agreement with Pakistan. Maharaja wished to have to similar standstill agreement with India till he made up his mind on accession. However New Delhi refused to enter a standstill agreement and wanted further discussion.
Despite the standstill agreement, Pakistan imposed economic blockade on Jammu and Kashmir. Supply of all the essential commodities like petrol, food, salt etc. was interrupted. Communications were interrupted. Transit of people was obstructed.

Jinnah’s Pakistan did not stop merely at the economic blockade. Pakistan planned invasion of Kashmir with meticulous care and showing significant strategic and tactical insight. Pakistan found partners to invade Kashmir – The tribals, the pathans. And the compensation – loot of Kashmir and the women as spoils of war. British had been paying Pathans to stop them from rising against the state. Something which newly independent Pakistan could not manage economically. Invasion of Kashmir and free loot of wealth and women was the compensation Pakistan designed for the tribals. Contrary to the false propaganda of Pakistan and its proxies, the invasion of Kashmir was planned directly by Army HQ of Pakistan. To put is simply India – Pakistan war of 1947 was not mere spontaneous tribal invasion. It was well planned invasion by Pak army HQ. The tribals were only the foot soldiers.

As it can be observed from both events Kalat and Kashmir, Jinnah displayed one common characteristic – Betrayal. Promise peace and deliver war and mass murder – This is story of Jinnah.
The betrayal was DNA of Jinnah and subsequently it became the DNA of Pakistan. Clubbed with deceit, this betrayal has resulted in wars, mass murders, genocide and persecution on Indian subcontinent in last 75 years.

Jai Hind
Kapil Naik

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Is Kangana Ranaut repeating what Sri Aurobindo said about Non Violence ?

Sri Aurobindo regarded non violence as something which puts premium on injustice.

Following are views of Sri Aurobindo ——

A certain class of mind shrinks from aggressiveness as if it is were a sin. Their temperament forbids them to feel the delight of battle and they look on what they can not understand as something monstrous and sinful.  “Heal hate by love” is their cry. Love is a sacred name, but it is easier to speak of love than to love. The love which drives out hate is a divine quality of which only one man in thousand is capable. A saint full of love for all mankind possesses it but the mass of mankind does not. Politics is concerned with masses of mankind and not with individual saints. To ask masses of mankind to act as saints and to rise to the height of divine love in relation to their oppressors is to ignore human nature. It is to set premium on injustice and violence.

The Bhagwat Geeta is the best answer to those who shrink from battle  as a sin and aggression as a lowering of morality.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Lawyer to Separatist

Who is “My Government” in Mountbatten’s letter on 27 Oct 1947?
As per the Indian Independence Act 1947 and Government of India Act 1935, head of any Princely state was the only authority to take decision regarding accession to Dominion of India or Pakistan. Maharaja Hari Singh was the head of Princely state of Jammu and Kashmir. He signed Instrument of accession on 26th Oct 1947. The Instrument of Accession signed by Maharaja Hari Singh was no different from the Instrument of Accession designed by Lord Mountbatten to be used by nearly 550 + Princely States outside British India.

Along with Instrument of Accession, Maharaja Hari Singh wrote a separate letter to Lord Mountbatten briefing him about the prevailing situation in JnK. In his letter, Maharaja clearly mentions that Afridis and Pakistani Soldiers in plain clothes and Desperados with modern weapons have been allowed to infiltrate the state. In his letter Maharaja also mentions that the mass infiltration with up to date weapons cannot be done without knowledge of provincial government of NWFP and Government of Pakistan. Thus, Maharaja specifically accuses Pakistan as the aggressor in first war between India and Pakistan.

Further in the letter, Maharaja claims that the people of the state, both Hindus and Muslims generally have taken no part at all. It is very critical to note that, Maharaja does not even mildly hint the disapproval of the state subject in joining the Dominion of India. Neither Maharaja mentions in his letter any local dispute or dissent in joining Dominion of India. Thus, in totality the accession of JnK was legal, legitimate and willful and in line with provisions of Indian Independence Act 1947 and Government of India act 1935.

In response to the letter from Maharaja, Lord Mountbatten wrote back saying –

It is my government’s wish that as soon as the law and order have been restored in Kashmir and its soil is cleared of the invader, the question of state’s accession should be settled by a reference to the people.

Dissection of Lord Mountbatten’s reply.
Why the “My Government’s wish” is unconstitutional and Who is Lord Mountbatten referring to when he says “My Government”? He of course most certainly is referring to supreme leader of the Constituent Assembly – Mr. Jawaharlal Nehru, the first prime minister of India. Mountbatten implicitly mentioned Nehru in his reply without naming him directly.

Now let’s see if this is a legitimate wish under legal framework. The Government of India Act 1935 lays down provisions regarding accession of princely states in clause 6. The clause 6 says – the Indian state shall be deemed to have acceded to the Dominion if the Governor General has signified his acceptance of Instrument of Accession executed by the ruler. Absolutely nowhere in Government of India Act 1935 and Indian independence Act 1947, there is any mention of (1) Reference to the people (2) Plebiscite (3) Referendum. Both the acts clearly rest the ownership of accession completely and solely with the head of Princely state.

The illegitimate wish of “My Government”, completely unconstitutional in nature, not in accordance with prevailing legal provisions of both acts, later provided breeding ground for separatist to argue and propagate their case. The whole case of separatists stands on unconstitutional grounds outside legal framework.

Unfortunately, India’s Prevailing “My Government” became the lawyer to separatist.

Jai Hind, Kapil Naik…

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments

Tikait is New Charan Singh

Rakesh Tikait is leader of Bhartiya Kisan Union (BKU). His Farmer’s protest is presently backed by Rahul Gandhi of Congress.

BKU was founded by Charan Singh – Dy PM in first non Congress government led by Morarji Desai.

Misled by Ms. Gandhi, Charan Singh ditched Desai, toppled his Govt & himself became PM with assurance of support from Ms. Gandhi. However Charan Singh ended up resigning in 23 days as Ms. Gandhi withdrew support. Soon elections were held & Congress was back in power. Ms. Gandhi used Charan Singh as a pawn and sacrificed him to get back to power.

Seems present leader of BKU , Tikait hasn’t read history of Family.

The way Khalistani separatists are penetrating Farmer’s protest, very soon Rahul Gandhi will have no option but to disown Tikait.

Tikait will rot in Jail watching his fate die infront of his eyes, the way Charan Singh helplessly watched his career being destroyed by Ms. Gandhi.

The only difference will be that this time a non Congress government has full majority and Tikait will fall alone.

Jai Hind

Kapil Naik

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

CAA – Manufactured Revolt of Unhappy Losers

  1. India voted for CAB

BJP released its manifesto on 8th of April 2019. “Nation First” section stands 4th in the Table of Contents of the manifesto. There are total 8 points in the section nation first. the Citizenship Amendment Bill is one of the 8 points. The manifesto clearly promised citizenship amendment bill on Page 12.

On page 12 of Manifesto BJP promises this

We are committed to the enactment of the Citizenship Amendment Bill for the protection of

individuals of religious minority communities from neighbouring countries escaping persecution. We

will make all efforts to clarify the issues to the sections of population from the Northeastern states who

have expressed apprehensions regarding the legislation. We reiterate our commitment to protect the

linguistic, cultural and social identity of the people of Northeast. Hindus, Jains, Buddhists and Sikhs

escaping persecution from India’s neighbouring countries will be given citizenship in India.

In General elections 2019, BJP alone got 37 % votes resulting into victory in 303 seats out of total of 543 constituencies – An absolute majority. India voted for the BJP manifesto to be implemented.

Historically politicians in India were made fun of – for not keeping their promises and yet turning up for next elections asking for votes. This is one of those rare occasions where a ruling party is criticized for implementing its manifesto.

But there is a catch here. What is being thrown at government is no fair and just criticism of noble minds. 

  • Nothing Undemocratic

The CAB passed the test in Loksabha on 9th of December and Rajyasabha on 10th of December 2019.  One out of the total 18 bills tabled in the Parliament in the winter session of November and December. The bill duly signed by speaker and sent to President for signatures. There is no by passing of the routine procedure of converting a bill into act.  The Act has come into effect with due constitutional procedure.

  • What is it?

Now that I have given background of BJP manifesto before the general election, outcome of elections and procedure followed in CAB, let’s look into what CAB is and if it violates any provision as per latest version of constitution of India dated 31 July 2018.

The ammendact provides citizenship to religious minorities persecuted by majority in Islamic republics of Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan. The purpose of the bill is to restore dignity, honor and pride of those humiliated by persecuting majority in these countries. It is utter disrespect and intellectual dishonesty to seek an amendment that includes muslims of these countries who are none other than persecuting majority.  You can not give citizenship to persecuted minorities and persecuting majority together in one single amendment. To say this to happen is to say – majority never persecuted – which is rubbing salts on wounds of persecuted minorities.

And for the record, Muslims of neighboring Islamic republics can always apply individually for citizenship following footsteps of Adnan Sami.

There is no denial that there are Muslims in Pakistan and Bangladesh who truly identify themselves with the multi-cultural fabric of India and happily want to be part of it. I know few of them in personal capacity and believe we share the similar values. But to argue in favor of opening flood gates for communities which inherently do not want to coexist with Impure Land is calculated dishonesty. 

As regards the CAB it does not violate article 14 of the constitution which states “Equality before law.—The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India. And this is because the bill is unrelated to territory of India and its people.

4) Manufactured revolt of unhappy losers

Now coming to the last but not the least protest part of the CAB episode. It was made clear in parliament by Home minister Amit Shah that the bill is about giving citizenship and not taking away citizenship of Indians. On 16th of December 2019, Prime Minister Mr. Modi tweeted 5 times in one single day. First tweet saying that the act illustrates India’s centuries old culture of acceptance, harmony, compassion and brotherhood. Second tweet saying no Indian has anything to worry regarding this Act and the act is only for those who have faced years of persecution outside India. Third asking Indian people to stay away from any sort of rumor mongering and falsehoods. Fourth insisting vested interest groups should not be dividing us.  And finally, the fifth establishing that Debate, discussion and dissent are essential parts of democracy but, never has damage to public property and disturbance of normal life been a part of our ethos.

Debate in parliament, wide communication on social media, pitching it in Jharkhand election rallies was not enough. A section of India, a small one, have some other plans.

From burning down trains to damaging the buses, from throwing stones at police to brining public life at standstill, holding university public space to ransom, it is a measured attack, trying to make the situation appear like “State Vs People”.

The intellectual covering fire was tweeting frantically about protests actively encouraging people to come out on roads. One particular Modi hater has even given list of lawyers on twitter in case protestors get arrested. The exaggerated versions of the anger and fake news are planted to keep the protest burning. On 16th December 2019, in one single day alone, a known Kashmiri separatist empathizer tweeted 100 times, and a known Gujrat riot activist tweeted 59 times actively encouraging and supporting the protest.

Many of the online protestors who are asking to include Muslims from Pakistan/Bangladesh while providing Indian citizenship are the same people who insisted on having article 35A which stopped Indians outside Kashmir from setting in Kashmir.

Chances are in West Bengal you may get arrested for shouting Jay Shriram in front of Didi’s convoy. But you may be not be arrested for burning down a train. Certainly not if you are a Bangladeshi illegal migrant.

No article in Indian constitution provides liberty and protection to a student who is violently protesting in universities. And yet the unhappy losers of general elections 2019 kept providing intellectual covering fire for the students.

The protest against CAA has nothing to do with CAA.  This is Award Wapsi Rev 2.0 with additional feature of violence. The aim is to create civil unrest like situation which did not happen in Award Wapsi Rev 1.0.  The real aim is much bigger than simply seeking abrogation of CAA. This is self-evident. A known Kashmiri separatist empathizer reacted to Prime Minister’s tweet asking for suggestions on Mann Ki Baat — “Step Down”.

This is it. Manufactured Revolt of Unhappy Losers of 2019.  CAA is just another opportunity to fabricate an atmosphere for case against Mr. Modi.  And if that requires pushing country on brink of civil unrest to keep Mr. Modi’s focus away from real challenges ahead of the nation then political opponents would not think twice.

Unfortunately, some section of Muslims society have fallen prey to the sinister agenda set by the protestors. It is their lack of knowledge about the bill which is being exploited for political agenda. It is important that Muslims of India do not fall prey to political opponents of Modi and offer their shoulders as carriers of a manufactured revolt of unhappy losers of 2019 Lok Sabha elections.

Jai Hind

Kapil Naik

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Book Review : “J&K Invisible Faultlines”

Edited by Sandhya Jain and Published by Pentagon Press
Writers : Sandhya Jain, Shakti Munshi, Abha Khanna, Pankaj Gupta, Nidhi Bahuguna, Yasharaj Singh Bundela, Kuldip Chand Agnihotri

Jammu and Kashmir region has inspired lot of writers to pen down books, articles and research papers. Writers broadly with 2 categories have written on Kashmir. One category includes those writers who are possibly influenced by narratives set by
valley centric separatists, politicians, academicians and Nehruvian understanding of Kashmir. Other category of writers are those who leave you with factual information without trying to impress upon readers , an agenda driven narrative.

To begin with, I would like to highlight the chapter 6 by Shakti Munshi– “Kashmiri Pandits – Last Bastion of Nationalism”. The chapter narrates the situation in valley in 80s. What readers would appreciate the most is date wise account of murder and hate crimes which subsequently led to exodus of Hindu Community as sinisterly designed by Pakistan, Pro Pak – Militant Groups and Local Families for their own political gains — The story of intentional cold blooded, brutal and violent dislodging of Hindu community from the valley .

The book also includes issues that were never key discussion points in main stream media – “Chapter 11 on Delimitation by Shakti Munshi and Divya Roy. This chapter is an example of surfacing the untouched issues. Apart from introducing readers to the history of delimitation in India , the chapter precisely brings reader’s attention to why and how valley centric leaders, media and academicians would choose to deprive Jammu region of equitable share of membership in Legislative Assembly.

Abha Khanna in chapter 8 on Artilce 370 and 35-A grabs readers mind on why constitutional validity of both articles is presently challenged in Supreme Court. The chapter provides historical account of how both articles came into existence. The writer describes Article 35-A as – “A Fraud on the constitution of India” with reasoning on the legislative powers to amend the constitution.

J&K , invisible faultlines is one of those books which comes across as belonging to the category of writers trying to provide right information on – the story which was never told, the events which were suppressed , the neglected truth readers were deprived off.
The book clearly tries to legitimately and factually challenge Nehruvian paradigm which has so far dominated the public.

A “Must Read” Rating to the book by Kapil Naik

Disclaimer : Writer of this review does not support and encourage piracy and copyright violation.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

They were sleeping

They were sleeping – Poem by Kapil  Naik (
Kashmiri Pandits Killed – They were sleeping
Training in POK – They were sleeping
Snatched Guns from Police – They were sleeping
Took away EVM machines – They were sleeping
Burnt Indian flags – They were sleeping
Waived IS flags – They were sleeping
Met Hafiz – They were sleeping
Pelted Stones – They were sleeping
Gave shelter to Militants – They were sleeping
Made Wani a hero – They were sleeping
Bharat Tere tukade honge hazar – They were sleeping
Afzal hum Sharminda hai – They were slepping
Crossed border with Fake Notes – They were sleeping
They were sleeping as Indian Army was guarding them.
They opened eyes after safe and sound sleep, saw stone pelter being tied on a Army Jeep.
Oh my god, oh my god, How can Army be so horrible.
Jai Hind (shouting very loudly is Kapil Naik)
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Shameful Journalism – Sagarika Ghose


After reading tweet by Sagarika Ghose on URI Attacks (“So much for the Doval doctrine”), I am not amazed any more.  In fact I am convinced a leftist will stoop down to any extent in criticising Right Wing (RW), even if it comes at the cost of showing policies of national interest & national security in bad light.

A leftist will end up accusing and holding accountable RW for all intentions and activities of nation breakers within & outside India.

The desperation & crazy urge to criticise RW blinds leftists from knowing difference between – speaking against government & speaking against national interest.

Let me get straight to her tweet and raise a few questions

When there was no Doval doctrine, were Children of Jinnah friendly to us? Was Muslim Pakistan not waging a pseudo war (actually Jihad) on India (Only because it is a majorly Hindu Land)? Were 4 wars with Pak result of Doval doctrine? Was cross border terrorism result of Doval doctrine? India to satisfaction of Pseudo Seculars was ruled by congress for majority of time since 1947. Then why did Kashmiri Pundits were thrown out unduly out of their own land — Doval doctrine? Did Osama find safe haven in Pakistan because of Doval doctrine?

Doval or no Doval – Pakistan is epicentre of Islamic terrorism. Pakistan is a factory where terrorists are produced to wage war against Hindu Land. A factory which is well funded, perfect in production plan and strategic direction.

Every time in history when Jihadists could not regionally & ideologically expand to west, they have attacked east, especially Indian Sub-continent. Al Qaeda was formed in Indian Subcontinent in 2014 after they were hammered on west front.

Instead of doing journalistic research on who can be behind attacks in URI (Al Qaeda, IS , ISI , LeT), she ends up making fun of Doval doctrine out of desperation to criticise RW.

This is not the right time to criticise Doval doctrine. Doval doctrine, most suited or not, is defending this country from its enemies who made URI attack.

Jai Hind

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Protected: There is only one Islam

This content is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:

Posted in English | Enter your password to view comments.

Protected: Story of Pakistan they never told you. – Part I

This content is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:

Posted in English | Enter your password to view comments.

Little Guest – Photographs by Kapil Naik

1 5 4326

Posted in Photo Gallery | Leave a comment

Basic Quality of Life is India’s Highest Priority

India can not look at top of Maslow’s hierarchy for “haves”, when a large section  of “have nots” are not even touching base of Maslow’s hierarchy.

                                                                                                           Kapil Naik

On a warm Saturday as I drove towards vehicle repair station which is located next to a labour colony of an industrial zone, I came across the other side of India. Not the first time in my life though, every time it happens I understand what  highest priority India has as a nation. This is a side of India no Indian can be proud of after more than 60 years of Independence. A poverty ridden dirt box where people in thousands lack Basic qualities of Life.  It is not imperative here to describe the scenery of the poverty zones of an Asian country for readers to have right imagination of dirt box – The slums. However it useful to describe as it would provides right platform for the main argument presented in the article.

The slums of Mumbai are a living place with pathetic quality of life. Pathetic is a very soft description. Inhuman would be  the most apt word. An idea of house here is worse than an Western Public Toilet. Kids play around where gutter water overflows on roads and on water pipes. The eatables are sold next to public dustbins.  Here personal space is negative as single room houses are cramped with medium to large size families. A huge population of India lives but not with respectable living conditions.

This leads me to wonder what is India’s highest priority in 2015 ? How would ever a child in slums get as much access to resources as a child born in West or even in prosperous  sections of India.  A child born with access to world’s best resources is likely to be 50 years ahead in time to the child who lacks basics like access to  clean water, hygienic food , a school with decent  facilities and finally a park to play. This means we all have one date as mankind. But a generation of kids in 2015 are growing up in 1960 s. Their birth dates do not actually represent the living conditions they have.

In India state governments and central government see announcement of billion dollar investments as a sign of working governments. News papers are filled with pictures of government officials signing of trade agreements.  Question that remains unanswered is — Does it give a poor child a quality food in the evening ? Does it give poor child a glass of clean drinking water ? Does it provide a poor child enough level playing field so that he is in a position to compete with a child who is 50 years ahead by birth ?

What India needs right now is not fulfilment of aspirations of tho se who have gone beyond Maslow’s hierarchy of – Physiological needs, Safety Needs, Love and Belonging, Esteem and Self Actualisation. India does need a bullet train but not now. All it needs is trains where people are not cramped like animals to be taken on a slaughter day. India needs ambulances which reach you in less than 10 minutes irrespective of your economic status. India needs housing which is cheap and yet complete with basics facilities of life. Indian public spaces require assurances that no bomb would go off killing people in hoards. India needs air which is pollution free. India needs farmers who don’t commit suicide. India needs food with as much high quality as it is sold under the tag of export quality. India needs food distribution system where producer of food makes more money than seller of the food.  List is big. The point is India can not look at top of Maslow’s hierarchy for “haves ” unless large section of “have nots” are not even part of Maslow’s hierarchy. Any rise in growth rate and GDP is not worth unless it results in availability of basic of life to one and all. Any trade agreement is not a success unless it redistributes wealth among the citizens.

Poverty is not just a curse. It is the biggest form of violence. It is the biggest form of terrorism. It is the crime of highest order by any state in not giving basics of life to its citizens – to all of its citizens

Jai Hind

Kapil Naik



Posted in English | Leave a comment

Who the F*** Cares ? Third World Developing Country Forever. – 1

A nation where youth jumps red signal at will is unlikely to have strong future.

Red signal Countdown….. 7, 6 ,5, 4, 3, 2,…..This is not green signal. It is still Red.








Posted in English | Leave a comment

Has extremism touched the Indian Soil?

“An extremist is not just the enemy of the other religions he tries to decimate but it is in fact a bigger enemy of the religion he believes he represents”.

“India can also witness forced mass conversions, genocide and another 1947, if ideologies of ISIS, Boko Haram or Al Shabaab touch the Indian Soil”.

                                                                                                            Kapil Naik

What thought drives a religious extremist has been the question I have always been trying to find answers for.  Although on the face of it the reasons appear to be religious,  I have never been able to find conclusive answers as I am always distracted because of a suspicion in my mind that somewhere behind presence of religious extremism in Middle East &  Africa, there  possibly exist a western crony capitalist system which thrives on turbulence in these areas. For the proposed frame of this article I keep this point to be written over on some other day.

Coming to the thought that might drive an extremist, it is widely believed that an extremist is driven by the following ideology –———– Only my God is God & hence if you do not follow my God you are not actually following any God.  And those who don’t follow god (Non Believers) are either have to be killed or converted. And while bringing this thought into reality among the non believers if any believer gets death, he gets Heaven.

If this thought is to be believed to be true and accepted as the only reason behind birth of the organizations like ISIS, Boko Haram & Al Shabaab, we the citizens of this world have a serious problem on our hand which if unaddressed can wipe civilizations off this earth and bring great disrepute to the religion the extremists represent.

India’s first and foremost concern should be to find out if such ideologies are finding roots in India.

Having said that the ghost of religious extremism is not new to India. The extremism has been there since known and documented history of India. Be it multiple attempts of destruction of somnath temple, be it systematic humiliation of Kashmiri Pundits, be it war of panipat – religious extremism has been very much a threat.

My worst fear is that there exists a certain class of pseudo secularists – political people and media who will look the other way when such demon might be coming up in India.  Vote is important than justice after all.

India’s concern is not the presence of an extremist within its territories. Because the extremist can easily be located & handled as he prefers to be visible in order to inspire many others. He does not befriend the non believers to make them believe in his god. The real trouble is to deal with those people who refuse to comprehend threat of extremism as real. It is not as much difficult to deal with extremist as much it is to deal with people who overlook the presence of extremist or undermines the threat an extremist poses to the civilizations.

History of Extremism in India is rarely studied, scrutinized and addressed in modern India. The bitter truth of extremism is typically avoided with an idea – Extremism has no colour. To me this would be the biggest lie ever told on earth.

History is more important than any school teacher that has ever told you.  It is much more than remembering dates and saluting Heros. Purpose of history is to be able to take steps in right direction so as to avoid the darker side of history repeating itself.  There is no shame in learning from mistakes that may have happened in handling extremism in the past.

To stop the Ideology of extremism from proliferating in India it is important and urgent that we act ruthlessly against the extremist with strict laws and their ruthless implementation.  The vigilance teams, investigation teams and the Judiciary is kept completely untouched from political bias and interference.

We also must remember that we are acting against the ideology of the extremist and not the religion he represents. If we are mistaken about the fight against the ideologies of an extremist as fight against the religion he represents then unknowingly we are creating another extremist in ourselves.

And most importantly we need to act now before extremism becomes too big to be handled
through a political solution.

Jai Hind

Posted in English | 6 Comments

Pune Experience – Sawai Gandharva Festival 2013 – Photographs by Kapil Naik

Posted in Photo Gallery | Leave a comment

Hypocrisy of U R Ananthamurthy

(This article is no way intended to support Mr Modi as a PM candidate.  However it tries to uncover the dual yardstick of justice which writer URA carries.)

Why it is important to write on U R Ananthamurthy (URA)? And that too on which is a political blog and URA belongs to the world of literature.

Well for readers of this blog who have not followed Kannada literature, let me give very brief introduction of URA. He is the winner of Jnanpith Award – India’s highest award in literature. He is also a recipient of Padma Bhushan. He is by no means an ordinary Indian.  Certainly to many in India he is an intellectual of very high standards.

But then it is the hypocrisy in his political opinions and actions which make me write this article on him.   

Recently at a literary function in Bangalore, Mr URA said – “I don’t want to live in a world where Modi is Prime Minister.” ……… Oh really Mr URA?

Let me get some of the historical facts about URA out of bag for the readers. He holds a PHD from England – a country which ruled India for 150 years.  A country which destroyed India’s wealth, self respect and honour rendering us to have mentalities that of a slave. Good Enough. Nothing wrong in this. But is not a hypocrisy that getting a PHD from England (which ruled India) is acceptable to URA but not staying in India with Modi as PM. Further why Mr URA did not give his PHD back to Burmingham University after England attacked Iraq for supposedly having WMD. They have still not found WMD. May be URA can help them to find one.  

This is just one piece of his hypocrisy. Let me strip his burqa of hypocrisy apart further.

According to news published in ‘THE HINDU’ on 16th March 2004, he was ready to contest Loksabha Election from South Banglore with support from congress.  Surprised I am, he was ready to fight the election with support from a party directly linked with – 1984 anti Sikh riot and emergency of 1975. But he cannot stay in a country where Mr Modi is PM.  Can URA plz care to explain these double yardsticks of justice?

He can stay in a country where Kashmiri Pundits are mass slaughtered and driven out of valley destroying secular fabric of India. He can stay in a country where emergency is imposed. He can stay in a country where the migrants from Bangladesh have ID cards of Indian Establishments. He can stay in a country where people cross the border and take training from ISI to destabilize India. He can seek support from a party whose president was allegedly linked with Bofors scam. But he cannot stay in a country where Modi is PM.

What I find is URA is not consistent in his thinking.  He is not impartial as a writer. As a writer he is expected to think logically for establishment of Justice. His idea of justice is influenced by his ideology which makes him no different from BJP or Sangh Pariwar. If one has to distance himself, one should distance from 1984 riots , Godhra Train Burning and 2002 riots as all the events are really equally unfortunate to have taken place in history of India.

I don’t wish at that the intellectual like him should leave this country which is already depleted with intellectuals. He can really be a driver for change in India provided he does what he can do best – Create finest literature. But I don’t think he has proved himself to be a balanced opinion maker in politics of India.

But if he insists on leaving this country, I have a request to him. Let us know where he wants to go.  Western countries where capitalist war mongers rule. Europe which made colonies all over the world or how about Middle East where you would need a microscope to find the democracy. I guess for him the best country to be in is Pakistan. Because only staying in Pakistan will make him realize that Hindu is the most tolerant religion closest to humanity and Savarkar was not a divisive figure but an icon of nationalism.

And he will also realize if anywhere in the world, the interests of the minorities are best safe guarded, it is in Hindu India – even with Modi as PM. And I am proud of this fact.  

How about this selection for Mr URA? As I write this article I have just come across news of an Indian getting shot in Kenya in a mall for failing to answer question on Islam. I am hearing an announcement – This is final boarding call to Mr URA for a flight to Kenya. Plz proceed for boarding.

(This article is no way intended to support Modi as PM candidate.  However it tries to uncover the dual yardstick of justice which URA carries.)

Note:  Any correction to distortion of the facts is most welcome.

Jai Hind

Posted in English | 2 Comments

Dharamshala & Dalhousie Experience – Photographs by Kapil Naik


Posted in English | Leave a comment