Is Kangana Ranaut repeating what Sri Aurobindo said about Non Violence ?

Sri Aurobindo regarded non violence as something which puts premium on injustice.

Following are views of Sri Aurobindo ——

A certain class of mind shrinks from aggressiveness as if it is were a sin. Their temperament forbids them to feel the delight of battle and they look on what they can not understand as something monstrous and sinful.  “Heal hate by love” is their cry. Love is a sacred name, but it is easier to speak of love than to love. The love which drives out hate is a divine quality of which only one man in thousand is capable. A saint full of love for all mankind possesses it but the mass of mankind does not. Politics is concerned with masses of mankind and not with individual saints. To ask masses of mankind to act as saints and to rise to the height of divine love in relation to their oppressors is to ignore human nature. It is to set premium on injustice and violence.

The Bhagwat Geeta is the best answer to those who shrink from battle  as a sin and aggression as a lowering of morality.

Lawyer to Separatist

Who is “My Government” in Mountbatten’s letter on 27 Oct 1947?
As per the Indian Independence Act 1947 and Government of India Act 1935, head of any Princely state was the only authority to take decision regarding accession to Dominion of India or Pakistan. Maharaja Hari Singh was the head of Princely state of Jammu and Kashmir. He signed Instrument of accession on 26th Oct 1947. The Instrument of Accession signed by Maharaja Hari Singh was no different from the Instrument of Accession designed by Lord Mountbatten to be used by nearly 550 + Princely States outside British India.

Along with Instrument of Accession, Maharaja Hari Singh wrote a separate letter to Lord Mountbatten briefing him about the prevailing situation in JnK. In his letter, Maharaja clearly mentions that Afridis and Pakistani Soldiers in plain clothes and Desperados with modern weapons have been allowed to infiltrate the state. In his letter Maharaja also mentions that the mass infiltration with up to date weapons cannot be done without knowledge of provincial government of NWFP and Government of Pakistan. Thus, Maharaja specifically accuses Pakistan as the aggressor in first war between India and Pakistan.

Further in the letter, Maharaja claims that the people of the state, both Hindus and Muslims generally have taken no part at all. It is very critical to note that, Maharaja does not even mildly hint the disapproval of the state subject in joining the Dominion of India. Neither Maharaja mentions in his letter any local dispute or dissent in joining Dominion of India. Thus, in totality the accession of JnK was legal, legitimate and willful and in line with provisions of Indian Independence Act 1947 and Government of India act 1935.

In response to the letter from Maharaja, Lord Mountbatten wrote back saying –

It is my government’s wish that as soon as the law and order have been restored in Kashmir and its soil is cleared of the invader, the question of state’s accession should be settled by a reference to the people.

Dissection of Lord Mountbatten’s reply.
Why the “My Government’s wish” is unconstitutional and Who is Lord Mountbatten referring to when he says “My Government”? He of course most certainly is referring to supreme leader of the Constituent Assembly – Mr. Jawaharlal Nehru, the first prime minister of India. Mountbatten implicitly mentioned Nehru in his reply without naming him directly.

Now let’s see if this is a legitimate wish under legal framework. The Government of India Act 1935 lays down provisions regarding accession of princely states in clause 6. The clause 6 says – the Indian state shall be deemed to have acceded to the Dominion if the Governor General has signified his acceptance of Instrument of Accession executed by the ruler. Absolutely nowhere in Government of India Act 1935 and Indian independence Act 1947, there is any mention of (1) Reference to the people (2) Plebiscite (3) Referendum. Both the acts clearly rest the ownership of accession completely and solely with the head of Princely state.

The illegitimate wish of “My Government”, completely unconstitutional in nature, not in accordance with prevailing legal provisions of both acts, later provided breeding ground for separatist to argue and propagate their case. The whole case of separatists stands on unconstitutional grounds outside legal framework.

Unfortunately, India’s Prevailing “My Government” became the lawyer to separatist.

Jai Hind, Kapil Naik…

Tikait is New Charan Singh

Rakesh Tikait is leader of Bhartiya Kisan Union (BKU). His Farmer’s protest is presently backed by Rahul Gandhi of Congress.

BKU was founded by Charan Singh – Dy PM in first non Congress government led by Morarji Desai.

Misled by Ms. Gandhi, Charan Singh ditched Desai, toppled his Govt & himself became PM with assurance of support from Ms. Gandhi. However Charan Singh ended up resigning in 23 days as Ms. Gandhi withdrew support. Soon elections were held & Congress was back in power. Ms. Gandhi used Charan Singh as a pawn and sacrificed him to get back to power.

Seems present leader of BKU , Tikait hasn’t read history of Family.

The way Khalistani separatists are penetrating Farmer’s protest, very soon Rahul Gandhi will have no option but to disown Tikait.

Tikait will rot in Jail watching his fate die infront of his eyes, the way Charan Singh helplessly watched his career being destroyed by Ms. Gandhi.

The only difference will be that this time a non Congress government has full majority and Tikait will fall alone.

Jai Hind

Kapil Naik

CAA – Manufactured Revolt of Unhappy Losers

  1. India voted for CAB

BJP released its manifesto on 8th of April 2019. “Nation First” section stands 4th in the Table of Contents of the manifesto. There are total 8 points in the section nation first. the Citizenship Amendment Bill is one of the 8 points. The manifesto clearly promised citizenship amendment bill on Page 12.

On page 12 of Manifesto BJP promises this

We are committed to the enactment of the Citizenship Amendment Bill for the protection of

individuals of religious minority communities from neighbouring countries escaping persecution. We

will make all efforts to clarify the issues to the sections of population from the Northeastern states who

have expressed apprehensions regarding the legislation. We reiterate our commitment to protect the

linguistic, cultural and social identity of the people of Northeast. Hindus, Jains, Buddhists and Sikhs

escaping persecution from India’s neighbouring countries will be given citizenship in India.

In General elections 2019, BJP alone got 37 % votes resulting into victory in 303 seats out of total of 543 constituencies – An absolute majority. India voted for the BJP manifesto to be implemented.

Historically politicians in India were made fun of – for not keeping their promises and yet turning up for next elections asking for votes. This is one of those rare occasions where a ruling party is criticized for implementing its manifesto.

But there is a catch here. What is being thrown at government is no fair and just criticism of noble minds. 

  • Nothing Undemocratic

The CAB passed the test in Loksabha on 9th of December and Rajyasabha on 10th of December 2019.  One out of the total 18 bills tabled in the Parliament in the winter session of November and December. The bill duly signed by speaker and sent to President for signatures. There is no by passing of the routine procedure of converting a bill into act.  The Act has come into effect with due constitutional procedure.

  • What is it?

Now that I have given background of BJP manifesto before the general election, outcome of elections and procedure followed in CAB, let’s look into what CAB is and if it violates any provision as per latest version of constitution of India dated 31 July 2018.

The ammendact provides citizenship to religious minorities persecuted by majority in Islamic republics of Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan. The purpose of the bill is to restore dignity, honor and pride of those humiliated by persecuting majority in these countries. It is utter disrespect and intellectual dishonesty to seek an amendment that includes muslims of these countries who are none other than persecuting majority.  You can not give citizenship to persecuted minorities and persecuting majority together in one single amendment. To say this to happen is to say – majority never persecuted – which is rubbing salts on wounds of persecuted minorities.

And for the record, Muslims of neighboring Islamic republics can always apply individually for citizenship following footsteps of Adnan Sami.

There is no denial that there are Muslims in Pakistan and Bangladesh who truly identify themselves with the multi-cultural fabric of India and happily want to be part of it. I know few of them in personal capacity and believe we share the similar values. But to argue in favor of opening flood gates for communities which inherently do not want to coexist with Impure Land is calculated dishonesty. 

As regards the CAB it does not violate article 14 of the constitution which states “Equality before law.—The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India. And this is because the bill is unrelated to territory of India and its people.

4) Manufactured revolt of unhappy losers

Now coming to the last but not the least protest part of the CAB episode. It was made clear in parliament by Home minister Amit Shah that the bill is about giving citizenship and not taking away citizenship of Indians. On 16th of December 2019, Prime Minister Mr. Modi tweeted 5 times in one single day. First tweet saying that the act illustrates India’s centuries old culture of acceptance, harmony, compassion and brotherhood. Second tweet saying no Indian has anything to worry regarding this Act and the act is only for those who have faced years of persecution outside India. Third asking Indian people to stay away from any sort of rumor mongering and falsehoods. Fourth insisting vested interest groups should not be dividing us.  And finally, the fifth establishing that Debate, discussion and dissent are essential parts of democracy but, never has damage to public property and disturbance of normal life been a part of our ethos.

Debate in parliament, wide communication on social media, pitching it in Jharkhand election rallies was not enough. A section of India, a small one, have some other plans.

From burning down trains to damaging the buses, from throwing stones at police to brining public life at standstill, holding university public space to ransom, it is a measured attack, trying to make the situation appear like “State Vs People”.

The intellectual covering fire was tweeting frantically about protests actively encouraging people to come out on roads. One particular Modi hater has even given list of lawyers on twitter in case protestors get arrested. The exaggerated versions of the anger and fake news are planted to keep the protest burning. On 16th December 2019, in one single day alone, a known Kashmiri separatist empathizer tweeted 100 times, and a known Gujrat riot activist tweeted 59 times actively encouraging and supporting the protest.

Many of the online protestors who are asking to include Muslims from Pakistan/Bangladesh while providing Indian citizenship are the same people who insisted on having article 35A which stopped Indians outside Kashmir from setting in Kashmir.

Chances are in West Bengal you may get arrested for shouting Jay Shriram in front of Didi’s convoy. But you may be not be arrested for burning down a train. Certainly not if you are a Bangladeshi illegal migrant.

No article in Indian constitution provides liberty and protection to a student who is violently protesting in universities. And yet the unhappy losers of general elections 2019 kept providing intellectual covering fire for the students.

The protest against CAA has nothing to do with CAA.  This is Award Wapsi Rev 2.0 with additional feature of violence. The aim is to create civil unrest like situation which did not happen in Award Wapsi Rev 1.0.  The real aim is much bigger than simply seeking abrogation of CAA. This is self-evident. A known Kashmiri separatist empathizer reacted to Prime Minister’s tweet asking for suggestions on Mann Ki Baat — “Step Down”.

This is it. Manufactured Revolt of Unhappy Losers of 2019.  CAA is just another opportunity to fabricate an atmosphere for case against Mr. Modi.  And if that requires pushing country on brink of civil unrest to keep Mr. Modi’s focus away from real challenges ahead of the nation then political opponents would not think twice.

Unfortunately, some section of Muslims society have fallen prey to the sinister agenda set by the protestors. It is their lack of knowledge about the bill which is being exploited for political agenda. It is important that Muslims of India do not fall prey to political opponents of Modi and offer their shoulders as carriers of a manufactured revolt of unhappy losers of 2019 Lok Sabha elections.

Jai Hind

Kapil Naik

Book Review : “J&K Invisible Faultlines”

Edited by Sandhya Jain and Published by Pentagon Press
Writers : Sandhya Jain, Shakti Munshi, Abha Khanna, Pankaj Gupta, Nidhi Bahuguna, Yasharaj Singh Bundela, Kuldip Chand Agnihotri

Jammu and Kashmir region has inspired lot of writers to pen down books, articles and research papers. Writers broadly with 2 categories have written on Kashmir. One category includes those writers who are possibly influenced by narratives set by
valley centric separatists, politicians, academicians and Nehruvian understanding of Kashmir. Other category of writers are those who leave you with factual information without trying to impress upon readers , an agenda driven narrative.

To begin with, I would like to highlight the chapter 6 by Shakti Munshi– “Kashmiri Pandits – Last Bastion of Nationalism”. The chapter narrates the situation in valley in 80s. What readers would appreciate the most is date wise account of murder and hate crimes which subsequently led to exodus of Hindu Community as sinisterly designed by Pakistan, Pro Pak – Militant Groups and Local Families for their own political gains — The story of intentional cold blooded, brutal and violent dislodging of Hindu community from the valley .

The book also includes issues that were never key discussion points in main stream media – “Chapter 11 on Delimitation by Shakti Munshi and Divya Roy. This chapter is an example of surfacing the untouched issues. Apart from introducing readers to the history of delimitation in India , the chapter precisely brings reader’s attention to why and how valley centric leaders, media and academicians would choose to deprive Jammu region of equitable share of membership in Legislative Assembly.

Abha Khanna in chapter 8 on Artilce 370 and 35-A grabs readers mind on why constitutional validity of both articles is presently challenged in Supreme Court. The chapter provides historical account of how both articles came into existence. The writer describes Article 35-A as – “A Fraud on the constitution of India” with reasoning on the legislative powers to amend the constitution.

J&K , invisible faultlines is one of those books which comes across as belonging to the category of writers trying to provide right information on – the story which was never told, the events which were suppressed , the neglected truth readers were deprived off.
The book clearly tries to legitimately and factually challenge Nehruvian paradigm which has so far dominated the public.

A “Must Read” Rating to the book by Kapil Naik

Disclaimer : Writer of this review does not support and encourage piracy and copyright violation.

They were sleeping

They were sleeping – Poem by Kapil  Naik (
Kashmiri Pandits Killed – They were sleeping
Training in POK – They were sleeping
Snatched Guns from Police – They were sleeping
Took away EVM machines – They were sleeping
Burnt Indian flags – They were sleeping
Waived IS flags – They were sleeping
Met Hafiz – They were sleeping
Pelted Stones – They were sleeping
Gave shelter to Militants – They were sleeping
Made Wani a hero – They were sleeping
Bharat Tere tukade honge hazar – They were sleeping
Afzal hum Sharminda hai – They were slepping
Crossed border with Fake Notes – They were sleeping
They were sleeping as Indian Army was guarding them.
They opened eyes after safe and sound sleep, saw stone pelter being tied on a Army Jeep.
Oh my god, oh my god, How can Army be so horrible.
Jai Hind (shouting very loudly is Kapil Naik)

Shameful Journalism – Sagarika Ghose


After reading tweet by Sagarika Ghose on URI Attacks (“So much for the Doval doctrine”), I am not amazed any more.  In fact I am convinced a leftist will stoop down to any extent in criticising Right Wing (RW), even if it comes at the cost of showing policies of national interest & national security in bad light.

A leftist will end up accusing and holding accountable RW for all intentions and activities of nation breakers within & outside India.

The desperation & crazy urge to criticise RW blinds leftists from knowing difference between – speaking against government & speaking against national interest.

Let me get straight to her tweet and raise a few questions

When there was no Doval doctrine, were Children of Jinnah friendly to us? Was Muslim Pakistan not waging a pseudo war (actually Jihad) on India (Only because it is a majorly Hindu Land)? Were 4 wars with Pak result of Doval doctrine? Was cross border terrorism result of Doval doctrine? India to satisfaction of Pseudo Seculars was ruled by congress for majority of time since 1947. Then why did Kashmiri Pundits were thrown out unduly out of their own land — Doval doctrine? Did Osama find safe haven in Pakistan because of Doval doctrine?

Doval or no Doval – Pakistan is epicentre of Islamic terrorism. Pakistan is a factory where terrorists are produced to wage war against Hindu Land. A factory which is well funded, perfect in production plan and strategic direction.

Every time in history when Jihadists could not regionally & ideologically expand to west, they have attacked east, especially Indian Sub-continent. Al Qaeda was formed in Indian Subcontinent in 2014 after they were hammered on west front.

Instead of doing journalistic research on who can be behind attacks in URI (Al Qaeda, IS , ISI , LeT), she ends up making fun of Doval doctrine out of desperation to criticise RW.

This is not the right time to criticise Doval doctrine. Doval doctrine, most suited or not, is defending this country from its enemies who made URI attack.

Jai Hind

Basic Quality of Life is India’s Highest Priority

India can not look at top of Maslow’s hierarchy for “haves”, when a large section  of “have nots” are not even touching base of Maslow’s hierarchy.

                                                                                                           Kapil Naik

On a warm Saturday as I drove towards vehicle repair station which is located next to a labour colony of an industrial zone, I came across the other side of India. Not the first time in my life though, every time it happens I understand what  highest priority India has as a nation. This is a side of India no Indian can be proud of after more than 60 years of Independence. A poverty ridden dirt box where people in thousands lack Basic qualities of Life.  It is not imperative here to describe the scenery of the poverty zones of an Asian country for readers to have right imagination of dirt box – The slums. However it useful to describe as it would provides right platform for the main argument presented in the article.

The slums of Mumbai are a living place with pathetic quality of life. Pathetic is a very soft description. Inhuman would be  the most apt word. An idea of house here is worse than an Western Public Toilet. Kids play around where gutter water overflows on roads and on water pipes. The eatables are sold next to public dustbins.  Here personal space is negative as single room houses are cramped with medium to large size families. A huge population of India lives but not with respectable living conditions.

This leads me to wonder what is India’s highest priority in 2015 ? How would ever a child in slums get as much access to resources as a child born in West or even in prosperous  sections of India.  A child born with access to world’s best resources is likely to be 50 years ahead in time to the child who lacks basics like access to  clean water, hygienic food , a school with decent  facilities and finally a park to play. This means we all have one date as mankind. But a generation of kids in 2015 are growing up in 1960 s. Their birth dates do not actually represent the living conditions they have.

In India state governments and central government see announcement of billion dollar investments as a sign of working governments. News papers are filled with pictures of government officials signing of trade agreements.  Question that remains unanswered is — Does it give a poor child a quality food in the evening ? Does it give poor child a glass of clean drinking water ? Does it provide a poor child enough level playing field so that he is in a position to compete with a child who is 50 years ahead by birth ?

What India needs right now is not fulfilment of aspirations of tho se who have gone beyond Maslow’s hierarchy of – Physiological needs, Safety Needs, Love and Belonging, Esteem and Self Actualisation. India does need a bullet train but not now. All it needs is trains where people are not cramped like animals to be taken on a slaughter day. India needs ambulances which reach you in less than 10 minutes irrespective of your economic status. India needs housing which is cheap and yet complete with basics facilities of life. Indian public spaces require assurances that no bomb would go off killing people in hoards. India needs air which is pollution free. India needs farmers who don’t commit suicide. India needs food with as much high quality as it is sold under the tag of export quality. India needs food distribution system where producer of food makes more money than seller of the food.  List is big. The point is India can not look at top of Maslow’s hierarchy for “haves ” unless large section of “have nots” are not even part of Maslow’s hierarchy. Any rise in growth rate and GDP is not worth unless it results in availability of basic of life to one and all. Any trade agreement is not a success unless it redistributes wealth among the citizens.

Poverty is not just a curse. It is the biggest form of violence. It is the biggest form of terrorism. It is the crime of highest order by any state in not giving basics of life to its citizens – to all of its citizens

Jai Hind

Kapil Naik



Has extremism touched the Indian Soil?

“An extremist is not just the enemy of the other religions he tries to decimate but it is in fact a bigger enemy of the religion he believes he represents”.

“India can also witness forced mass conversions, genocide and another 1947, if ideologies of ISIS, Boko Haram or Al Shabaab touch the Indian Soil”.

                                                                                                            Kapil Naik

What thought drives a religious extremist has been the question I have always been trying to find answers for.  Although on the face of it the reasons appear to be religious,  I have never been able to find conclusive answers as I am always distracted because of a suspicion in my mind that somewhere behind presence of religious extremism in Middle East &  Africa, there  possibly exist a western crony capitalist system which thrives on turbulence in these areas. For the proposed frame of this article I keep this point to be written over on some other day.

Coming to the thought that might drive an extremist, it is widely believed that an extremist is driven by the following ideology –———– Only my God is God & hence if you do not follow my God you are not actually following any God.  And those who don’t follow god (Non Believers) are either have to be killed or converted. And while bringing this thought into reality among the non believers if any believer gets death, he gets Heaven.

If this thought is to be believed to be true and accepted as the only reason behind birth of the organizations like ISIS, Boko Haram & Al Shabaab, we the citizens of this world have a serious problem on our hand which if unaddressed can wipe civilizations off this earth and bring great disrepute to the religion the extremists represent.

India’s first and foremost concern should be to find out if such ideologies are finding roots in India.

Having said that the ghost of religious extremism is not new to India. The extremism has been there since known and documented history of India. Be it multiple attempts of destruction of somnath temple, be it systematic humiliation of Kashmiri Pundits, be it war of panipat – religious extremism has been very much a threat.

My worst fear is that there exists a certain class of pseudo secularists – political people and media who will look the other way when such demon might be coming up in India.  Vote is important than justice after all.

India’s concern is not the presence of an extremist within its territories. Because the extremist can easily be located & handled as he prefers to be visible in order to inspire many others. He does not befriend the non believers to make them believe in his god. The real trouble is to deal with those people who refuse to comprehend threat of extremism as real. It is not as much difficult to deal with extremist as much it is to deal with people who overlook the presence of extremist or undermines the threat an extremist poses to the civilizations.

History of Extremism in India is rarely studied, scrutinized and addressed in modern India. The bitter truth of extremism is typically avoided with an idea – Extremism has no colour. To me this would be the biggest lie ever told on earth.

History is more important than any school teacher that has ever told you.  It is much more than remembering dates and saluting Heros. Purpose of history is to be able to take steps in right direction so as to avoid the darker side of history repeating itself.  There is no shame in learning from mistakes that may have happened in handling extremism in the past.

To stop the Ideology of extremism from proliferating in India it is important and urgent that we act ruthlessly against the extremist with strict laws and their ruthless implementation.  The vigilance teams, investigation teams and the Judiciary is kept completely untouched from political bias and interference.

We also must remember that we are acting against the ideology of the extremist and not the religion he represents. If we are mistaken about the fight against the ideologies of an extremist as fight against the religion he represents then unknowingly we are creating another extremist in ourselves.

And most importantly we need to act now before extremism becomes too big to be handled
through a political solution.

Jai Hind

Hypocrisy of U R Ananthamurthy

(This article is no way intended to support Mr Modi as a PM candidate.  However it tries to uncover the dual yardstick of justice which writer URA carries.)

Why it is important to write on U R Ananthamurthy (URA)? And that too on which is a political blog and URA belongs to the world of literature.

Well for readers of this blog who have not followed Kannada literature, let me give very brief introduction of URA. He is the winner of Jnanpith Award – India’s highest award in literature. He is also a recipient of Padma Bhushan. He is by no means an ordinary Indian.  Certainly to many in India he is an intellectual of very high standards.

But then it is the hypocrisy in his political opinions and actions which make me write this article on him.   

Recently at a literary function in Bangalore, Mr URA said – “I don’t want to live in a world where Modi is Prime Minister.” ……… Oh really Mr URA?

Let me get some of the historical facts about URA out of bag for the readers. He holds a PHD from England – a country which ruled India for 150 years.  A country which destroyed India’s wealth, self respect and honour rendering us to have mentalities that of a slave. Good Enough. Nothing wrong in this. But is not a hypocrisy that getting a PHD from England (which ruled India) is acceptable to URA but not staying in India with Modi as PM. Further why Mr URA did not give his PHD back to Burmingham University after England attacked Iraq for supposedly having WMD. They have still not found WMD. May be URA can help them to find one.  

This is just one piece of his hypocrisy. Let me strip his burqa of hypocrisy apart further.

According to news published in ‘THE HINDU’ on 16th March 2004, he was ready to contest Loksabha Election from South Banglore with support from congress.  Surprised I am, he was ready to fight the election with support from a party directly linked with – 1984 anti Sikh riot and emergency of 1975. But he cannot stay in a country where Mr Modi is PM.  Can URA plz care to explain these double yardsticks of justice?

He can stay in a country where Kashmiri Pundits are mass slaughtered and driven out of valley destroying secular fabric of India. He can stay in a country where emergency is imposed. He can stay in a country where the migrants from Bangladesh have ID cards of Indian Establishments. He can stay in a country where people cross the border and take training from ISI to destabilize India. He can seek support from a party whose president was allegedly linked with Bofors scam. But he cannot stay in a country where Modi is PM.

What I find is URA is not consistent in his thinking.  He is not impartial as a writer. As a writer he is expected to think logically for establishment of Justice. His idea of justice is influenced by his ideology which makes him no different from BJP or Sangh Pariwar. If one has to distance himself, one should distance from 1984 riots , Godhra Train Burning and 2002 riots as all the events are really equally unfortunate to have taken place in history of India.

I don’t wish at that the intellectual like him should leave this country which is already depleted with intellectuals. He can really be a driver for change in India provided he does what he can do best – Create finest literature. But I don’t think he has proved himself to be a balanced opinion maker in politics of India.

But if he insists on leaving this country, I have a request to him. Let us know where he wants to go.  Western countries where capitalist war mongers rule. Europe which made colonies all over the world or how about Middle East where you would need a microscope to find the democracy. I guess for him the best country to be in is Pakistan. Because only staying in Pakistan will make him realize that Hindu is the most tolerant religion closest to humanity and Savarkar was not a divisive figure but an icon of nationalism.

And he will also realize if anywhere in the world, the interests of the minorities are best safe guarded, it is in Hindu India – even with Modi as PM. And I am proud of this fact.  

How about this selection for Mr URA? As I write this article I have just come across news of an Indian getting shot in Kenya in a mall for failing to answer question on Islam. I am hearing an announcement – This is final boarding call to Mr URA for a flight to Kenya. Plz proceed for boarding.

(This article is no way intended to support Modi as PM candidate.  However it tries to uncover the dual yardstick of justice which URA carries.)

Note:  Any correction to distortion of the facts is most welcome.

Jai Hind


Category: Non Fiction

Rating: Must Read

Book is published in 2009. It is written by veteran journalist and writer Imtiaz Gul.

A fascinating book which one would want to read in one single sitting. Imtiaz Gul has written a gem.

Book takes readers inside FATA region where militancy is thriving for last 30 years now. Reading this book is a journey, a journey which ends into destination of thorough understanding of FATA regions, its sharply divided non progressive intolerant tribes and multi dimensional religious radicalism associated with FATA region.   Readers of this book will be able to connect dots of drug lords, religious radicalism, and intelligence agencies operating in FATA region.

Apart from providing historical details of war going on in FATA region, book successfully helps reader to guess what is stored ahead for people of Pakistan.

This book unfolds how Pakistan’s strategic depth in Afghanistan has gone wrong and how snakes once they nurtured to fight against Russians in Afghanistan and against India in Kashmir have made Pakistan an epicenter  of world terrorism. And irony is those terrorist are doing damage more to Pakistan than they were supposed to do to Hindu India.

A book rates as Must Read.

Thank you Mr President

Ajmal Kasab’s fate is sealed by Mr Presidnet – Pranab Mukherjee.  Mr Mukherjee, congratulates you for rejecting kasab’s mercy petition. We hail you as real son of Bengal. We are proud of you. will only say with love – Omar Dada , Pranav dada.

The original royal Bengal tiger, mahanayak -Subhash Chandra Bose from where ever he is watching will be happy to know a true son of Bengal did it.  

We also congratulate home minister Sushil Kumar Shinde for executing the operation X with top secrecy.  It is not for media to know in advance the plans of home ministry. Profit driven media houses did not deserve this ‘breaking news’ to know before it happened.  

Jai Hind